Legal Opinion

Foster v. Traul

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2005No. 30052PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Frank Lane Foster sued Pocatello Regional Medical Center (PRMC) and medical service providers, alleging medical negligence and lack of informed consent. Foster appeals from a district court’s grant of summary judgment on both counts in favor of the Defendants. We affirm in part and vacate in part, remanding for further proceedings.

I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Immediately after undergoing back surgery at PRMC in December of 1998, Foster discovered he had lost all vision in his right eye, and suffered from reduced vision in his left eye. His condition was later diagnosed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cristo Viene Pentecostal Church v. PazIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Commercial Ventures, Inc. v. Rex M. & Lynn Lea Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mannos v. MossIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. SUHADOLNIK v. PressmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Foster v. TraulIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API