Legal Opinion

Mannos v. Moss

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2007No. 31958PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

This case derives from the sale of stock in Idaho Peterbilt, Inc. (“Peterbilt”) and GRM Leasing, Inc. (“GRM”). The stock purchaser, appellant Tyler Mannos, sued the sellers, Terry Lawrence and Lloyd Lawrence, and a third party, Todd Moss (collectively “the defendants”), alleging eleven causes of action after Peterbilt, Inc. proved economically unviable. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing all of Mannos’ claims. We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part.

I

Peterbilt was a closely-held Idaho corporation primarily engaged in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Palmer v. DermittIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Faw v. GreenwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wesco Autobody Supply, Inc. v. ErnestIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McCann v. McCannIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Gray v. Tri-Way Construction Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. DOE(s) v. Boy Scouts of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API