Legal Opinion

SUHADOLNIK v. Pressman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2011No. 37526PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case arising from a cataract operation performed by Dr. Scott Pressman on plaintiff-appellant Franz Suhadolnik. The Suhadolniks appeal the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of Respondents based on its determination that the Appellants’ expert, Dr. Hofbauer, failed to adequately inform himself on the local standard of care. We affirm.

I

Factual and Procedural History

Appellant Franz Suhadolnik argues that his cataract surgeon, Dr. Pressman, failed to adequately inquire about his prior use of the prescription drug Flomax,1 which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rhodehouse v. StuttsIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kozlowski v. RushIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McDaniel v. Inland Northwest Renal Care Group-Idaho, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-MainIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mattox v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bybee v. GormanIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Fisk v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Hall v. Rocky Mtn Emergency PhysiciansIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API