Center for Food Safety v. Thomas Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
This appeal represents another chapter in the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) regulation of Roundup Ready Alfalfa (“RRA”). RRA is a plant genetically “engineered” or “modified” by the Monsanto Company and Forage Genetics International to be resistant to the herbicide glyphosate, which Monsanto sells under the trade name Roundup. Farmers do not normally apply an herbicide like Roundup to alfalfa fields because the herbicide kills not only the weeds, but also the alfalfa crop. RRA’s tolerance to Roundup thus allows farmers to control…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alika Atay v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
- Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bader Farms, Inc. v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.