Legal Opinion
Kopperl v. Bain
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 2, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-1754 (CSH)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN COUNTS OF PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
This diversity action arises out of the parties’ participation in an automotive business venture that began in seeming harmony but collapsed in mutual recrimination. A detailed recitation of the case’s factual background appears in the Court’s prior Ruling reported at 2010 WL 3490980 (D.Conn. Aug. 30, 2010) (“Kopperl 7”), familiarity with which is assumed.
The operative pleading is Plaintiff Kop-perl’s Third Amended Complaint [Doc. 29] (“TAC”). The TAC alleges nineteen…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nielsen v. RabinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stanley Works Isr. Ltd. v. 500 Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Brown v. OtakeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Vossbrinck v. Eckert Seamans Cherin, & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Ahmed Abdullah Al Malik Financial Consulting Firm for Non-Securities v. Horseneck Capital Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Greene v. GrimesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.