Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Rabin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 13, 2014No. 12-4313-PRPublishedCited by 854 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRAUB, Circuit Judge:
Pro se plaintiff Charles Nielsen brought suit against defendant Dr. Elaine A. Rabin, among others, under the Fourteenth Amendment for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The District Court (Eric N. Vitaliano, Judge) dismissed the complaint on the ground that Nielsen did not adequately allege an element of his deliberate indifference claim: that Dr. Rabin had a sufficiently culpable state of mind. The court also denied Nielsen leave to amend 25 his complaint because additional allegations in Nielsen’s brief in opposition to Dr. Rabin’s motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Walker v. SchultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by854 opinions
- Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Concord Associates, L.P. v. Entertainment Properties TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Dane v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
849 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.