Walker v. Dallas
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
Petitioners, Larry and Winifred Walker, and their daughter, Rebecca, were injured when their car was struck by a car driven by respondent, Melanie Toyofuku Dallas (hereinafter “Dallas”). Petitioners sued respondents, Dallas and her husband, John Doe Dallas, for personal injuries caused by this auto accident. Respondent failed to appear and petitioner obtained a default judgment for $150,000. Respondent’s insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter “Liberty”), appeared and moved to set aside the default judgment. See 16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60. 1 Liberty…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Master Financial, Inc. v. WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Roberts v. RobertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Saucedo v. EngelbrechtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.