Legal Opinion

Saucedo v. Engelbrecht

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 5, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5537PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

Ramon Parra Saucedo appeals from the dismissal of his complaint for injuries sustained in an automobile accident with a vehicle owned by defendant Cliff Corcoran and driven by defendant Carl E. Engel-brecht, and the discharge of defendant/garnishee Continental National Assurance (CNA) and the award of attorney’s fees to CNA. The trial court found a lack of personal jurisdiction over Engelbrecht and insufficiency of service of process because Saucedo had served him by publication under Rule 4(e)(3), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. The court further found that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wells v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Walker v. DallasArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Llamas v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Master Financial, Inc. v. WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. OMEGA II INVESTMENT COMPANY v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Steven Sholem v. Hons. gass/contes/melissa LangevinArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Colley v. DyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Colley v. DyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API