Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Holmay

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1987No. C6-86-1442PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us on the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board to discipline respondent attorney for forging or procuring the forgery of his client’s signature on documents which he falsely notarized, submitted to a court, and served on the opposing party. We agree with the director that a suspension is warranted, but we impose a 30-day suspension rather than the recommended 60-day suspension.

On August 27, 1986, the director filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Jerome J. Holmay had forged and falsely notarized a client’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of FinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. In Re the Discipline of DowdalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Matter of Discipline of CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Matter of Discipline of DannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KleinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API