Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Baker v. Utecht
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 4, 1946No. 33,989PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Upon relator’s appeal from an order of the district court discharging a writ of habeas corpus issued in his behalf, respondent moves to quash said writ “upon the ground that the record shows no reason for allowing said writ of habeas corpus herein or for the discharge of the petitioner, and that the judgment of conviction under which the petitioner is now held a prisoner in the state prison cannot be collaterally attacked in a habeas corpus proceeding.”
Relator was convicted of the crime of sodomy on May 21, 1940, and sentenced to the state prison at Stillwater, where he is now…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.