Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, FSB
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This wrongful termination from employment action comes before the court for the consideration of defendants’ post-trial motions. Defendants move the court (1) for relief from the state district court’s previous denial of defendants’ post-trial motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); and (2) for amended findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) and 59(e). In essence, defendants challenge the state district court’s liability determination in all respects. Defendants also ask the court to reexamine and modify the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Clark v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Sherman v. KasotakisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Bennett v. Genoa Ag Center, Inc. (In Re Bennett)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Pro Edge L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
- Barber v. HansenDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020