Legal Opinion
Bregman v. Winkler
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff, as assignee of Kemach & Rosen, upon an assigned claim for work, labor and services, to wit, installing a water tank in connection with a hot water heater in premises No. 200 West Fifty-seventh street in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York. The pleadings are oral. The indorsement on the summons states the agreed price and reasonable value as $725, less a credit of $400; balance due $325. The defense is a general denial. The plaintiff’s only witness was one Abel Kemach, a member of the firm of Kemach & Rosen. Upon the trial the written contract was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- N. Margolys & Co. v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
- People ex rel. Lavier v. HesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Sprague v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Johnston v. DahlgrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re NichollsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State Ex Rel. City of Sioux City v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- People v. Osborne, New York County Courts1933
- (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971