N. Margolys & Co. v. Goldstein
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by N. Margolys & Co. against Samuel Goldstein. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMacLEAN, J.
It is certified in the return that the plaintiff, by verified complaint annexed, complained for work, labor, and services *186and materials furnished, and that the defendant, by verified answer annexed, interposed a general denial and a demand for particulars. Neither pleading is annexed, though particulars were furnished. After the plaintiff had testified to the work upon request, that he had “repaired a Rider engine and the heaters and boilers and the hot water supply pipes in the building,” he testified, in answer to questions by defendant’s counsel that he was not a licensed plumber, and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Morton v. Imperial Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. City of Sioux City v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Bregman v. WinklerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923
- American Builders Supply Corp. v. Enchanted Builders, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Rugg v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.