Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Sioux City v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1941No. 45431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStiger, J.

I. An amendment to the information stated that defendant installed a water softener in a home in Sioux City, Iowa, by connecting the softener to the water-supply distributing pipes; that the installation amounted to an altering of the plumbing system of the house in that it was connected with the water-supply distributing pipes.

Defendant is not a licensed plumber. His business is installing and servicing softeners in the manner described in the information. The complaint against him is that he makes the installation and does not hire a licensed plumber to do the work.

Section 5775, 1939 Code,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. People Ex Rel. Nechamcus v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Scully v. HallihanIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doyle v. KahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. City of Osceola v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Clark v. District Court Ex Rel. Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Ales v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API