Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 6, 2002No. 01-15497PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this.appeal is whether a jury verdict against the Double R Specialty Molding Co., Inc. (“Double R”) for violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), is covered under a commercial general liability insurance policy issued by Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (“Nationwide”). Both parties moved for summary judgment and the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Nationwide. It found that the verdict was not covered under the terms of the liability insurance policy because the Lanham Act violation could not result in an “advertising…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burton v. City of Belle GladeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Belinda Hulsey v. Pride RestaurantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Ellen Storck v. City of Coral SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.