Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Patterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Murray county, P. E. Brown, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action upon three promissory notes executed and delivered by defendants in part payment for a steam threshing machine. The defense set up in the answer was a breach of warranty of the machine, with a large claim for damages said to have been caused by the breach. The verdict was for defendants in a sum exceeding $1,000, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying anew trial.
From the evidence it appears that defendants ordered from the-plaintiff corporation, through the agents of the latter at Luveme, Minnesota, a threshing machine of a certain description, to be loaded on the cars…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rowell v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Deering v. ThomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- McCormick v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Fitzpatrick v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Maxwell v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Nunn v. BrillhartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Powers v. Sunylan Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.