Deering v. Thom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action by plaintiff in the district court for McLeod county on two promissory notes made by defendant, payable to the order of J. D. Easter & Co., and by the latter sold and assigned to plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from an order by Macdonald, J., refusing a new trial, after a verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtGtlfillan, C. J.
This action is brought on two instruments executed by defendant to J. D. Easter & Co., and by them transferred to the .plaintiff. By one, defendant promised to pay said J. D. Easter & Co., or order, $100, and by the other to pay them $120, with interest, and to pay an attorney’s fee if collected by suit. They recited that they were given upon the purchase of a Marsh harvester, on condition that the title or ownership should not pass until the notes were paid; the payees reserving the right to declare the notes due at any time they might deem themselves insecure, and to take possession of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. RadatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Third National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Pratt v. BeaupreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Bingham v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Bingham v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by23 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Rowell v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Oster v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Brunswick-Balke Collender Co. v. BoutellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Janes v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.