Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1981No. 12982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We remand for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Petitioner and appellee each refer to “the trial court’s findings of fact” entered to support the order denying the petitioner’s request for post-conviction relief. It does not appear, however, that any findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered. The record contains only what is indexed *53and captioned as “Respondent’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” which, on the first page thereof, bears a marginally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Essington v. BucheleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kinzler v. NaceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Carroll v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API