Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1988No. 15859PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Carroll claims his misdemeanor DWI conviction cannot be enhanced once to felony status and then enhanced again under the habitual felony statute. The court denied Carroll’s habeas corpus action and he appeals. We reverse and remand for resen-tencing.

Facts

Carroll was indicted for driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages (DWI) on August 28, 1986, a violation of SDCL 32-23-1(2). The state filed two separate part II informations. The first part II information alleged that the DWI offense was his third such offense within five years based upon July 22, 1983, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LaytonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. ChapmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GroomsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. HellingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Marshall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lader v. Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GuthmillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. AndersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API