Legal Opinion
State v. Means
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1978No. 11826PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERTZ, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, after a trial to the court sitting without a jury, was found guilty of the crime of Rioting to Obstruct (SDCL 22-10-4). Defendant appeals from his conviction, claiming a number of errors by the trial court.
The defendant was indicted, and subsequently arrested, as the result of a disturbance involving policemen and Indian spectators, that occurred in the south courtroom on the third floor of the Minnehaha County Courthouse, in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, during the morning of April 30, 1974. The courtroom was at that time being used for the trial of several…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. PhippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. McBrideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- William R. Cody v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HuftileSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.