Legal Opinion
In Re Calpine Corporation Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 28, 2003No. C 02-1200 SBAPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This is a consolidated putative securities class action brought against defendant Calpine Corporation (“Calpine”) and other defendants pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a), and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77o. Mansukh B. Makadia and Laborers Local 1298 Pension Fund (“Plaintiffs”) have been named co-lead plaintiffs for the putative class.
Now before the Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re CNET Networks, Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Metropolitan Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007
- In Re Zoran Corp. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- In Re Wet Seal, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- In re American Apparel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.