Legal Opinion

In Re Zoran Corp. Derivative Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 5, 2007No. C 06-05503 WHAPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this shareholder derivative action alleging backdating of stock options, individual defendants and nominal defendant move to dismiss plaintiffs consolidated verified derivative complaint. The complaint alleges claims under Section 10(b), Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as a number of claims under Delaware state law. Because this is a derivative action, plaintiff is required to either…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Verisign, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  2. Patrick v. Alacer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. In Re Hansen Natural Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  5. Carlucci v. HanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API