In Re Zoran Corp. Derivative Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this shareholder derivative action alleging backdating of stock options, individual defendants and nominal defendant move to dismiss plaintiffs consolidated verified derivative complaint. The complaint alleges claims under Section 10(b), Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as a number of claims under Delaware state law. Because this is a derivative action, plaintiff is required to either…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Verisign, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Patrick v. Alacer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- In Re Hansen Natural Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Carlucci v. HanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.