Legal Opinion

Kaiserman Associates, Inc. v. Francis Town

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 970191PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

Anthony R. Martineau, an attorney, appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions on him pursuant to rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The court *463held that Mr. Martineau, in obtaining a writ of garnishment against a bank in which defendant Francis Town had an account, had violated Utah Code Ann. § 63-30-22(2), which provides that “garnishment may not issue against a governmental entity.”

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Kaiserman Associates, Inc., commenced this action against the Town to collect $2,496 it owed to Kaiserman for professional engineering services. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Falk v. Keene Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ray Adduono, Charles L. Abrahams, (Non-Party) v. World Hockey AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Barnard v. SutliffUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rukavina v. Triatlantic Ventures, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Adkins v. Uncle Bart's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Utah Down Syndrome Foundation, Inc. v. Utah Down Syndrome Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Fire Ins Exchange v. OltmannsUtah Supreme Court · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API