Legal Opinion

Falk v. Keene Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1989No. 55945-7PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

At issue is whether jury instructions regarding a claim that manufacturers' products were defectively designed either misstated the law or confused the jury by leading it to believe that common law negligence principles apply to a design defect claim brought under the tort reform act of 1981. We hold that ordinary negligence is not the standard adopted by the Legislature for determining manufacturer liability for defectively designed products, that the instructions given in this case erroneously allowed the jury to apply a common law negligence standard, and that the error is reversible.

This…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Siegler v. KuhlmanWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Alverado v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API