Thorp Sales Corp. v. Lease
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
Two issues are raised by the two appeals:
1. Did the circuit court properly conclude that it lacked jurisdiction of the first cause of action against respondent as administratrix because of the pending probate proceedings ?
2. Does sec. 240.10, Stats., bar the introduction of parol evidence to prove an agency relationship between respondent and her husband ?
The scope of the circuit court’s jurisdiction.
In Cawker v. Dreutzer 1 this court said:
“[U] nless it is made to appear that the county court before which an estate is being administered cannot af ford as adequate, complete and efficient a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Burnham v. NortonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Hale v. KreiselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Krzysko v. GaudynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Purtell v. TehanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winston v. MinkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Gerlach v. ThiemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. PalmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975