Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Rideout

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action is by the grantee and assignee of a daughter of the defendant Rideout to compel a conveyance to him of a half interest in a house and lot and to recover a half share of the net rents of the premises on the ground that the premises were conveyed to the defendant Rideout by his daughter without consideration under agreement by him to sell the premises and turn over to the daughter one half of the proceeds, which agreement he has failed and refused to perform. The defendants deny that the conveyance was without consideration and deny any agreement to sell or to account for proceeds of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. House v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Silberstein v. . SilbersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hymes v. . EsteyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Masino v. SechrestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Lakeshore Commercial Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  3. Lyman Morgan and Robert Dalton, Co-Partners, D/B/A Rite-Type Company v. Inter-Continental Trading Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. Hutchinson v. MaiwurmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Viera Sosa v. Comisión Hípica de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API