Legal Opinion

J. W. Ringrose Co. v. Sloane

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1920No. 5672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law. Action by the J. W. Ringrose Company against W. & J. Sloane. On motion to take off nonsuit.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff claims upon an alleged contract with the defendant, under which the plaintiff was to have the exclusive sale or agency for 56'' MS fabric to be used for linings for horse blankets, and if the defendant quoted any outside parties on the fabric, it would afford the plaintiff a protection of 10 per cent, to its cost to the plaintiff as a profit, and if any outside parties requested quotations, the defendant was to refer them to the plaintiff. If the terms of the contract are found in the letters offered in evidence by the plaintiff, with the parol…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Manning v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Butler v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Whitmore v. Dwelling House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. General Reinsurance Corp. v. Southern Surety Co. of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Nations v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. J. W. Ringrose Co. v. SloaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  5. Devore v. Piedmont Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API