Legal Opinion
Barker v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 2006No. 03-85PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶ 1] James Barker was convicted after a bench trial of one count of larceny by bailee for converting items belonging to his employer, Computer Professionals Unlimited (CPU), to his own use. He appealed his conviction, and we issued a limited remand for an evi-dentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Back in this Court after the remand, we concluded the district court “unduly limited the evidence Barker was allowed to present at the remand hearing.” Barker v. State, 2005 WY 20, ¶ 1, 106 P.3d 297, 298 (Wyo.2005). Consequently, we reversed the district…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Leyva v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Yellowbear v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Strandlien v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Roeschlein v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.