Legal Opinion
Strandlien v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 2007No. 05-8PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] Appellant Chad Strandlien seeks review of his conviction for aggravated vehicular homicide under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106(b)(i) (LexisNexis 2005). 1 Strandlien con tends, among other things, that he was denied a speedy trial and that defense counsel rendered constitutionally deficient assistance by failing to consult with a pertinent expert witness. We find no speedy trial violation, but we do find that Strandlien was denied effective assistance of counsel. We therefore reverse Strandlien's conviction.
ISSUES
[12] Strandlien raises the following issues in his opening brief:
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Nathaniel Castellanos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Humphrey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Boucher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.