Legal Opinion

American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 9, 1968No. C.D. 3246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The problem in the present case is to determine the proper classification of merchandise described on the invoice as “Papier Mache Hawaiian Girl 5.” The articles were classified by the collector as dolls, composed in part of the fabrics enumerated in paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and duty was assessed at 38 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of that act, as modified by T.D. 54108.1 Plaintiffs claim that the articles are not “dolls” within the meaning of paragraph 1513; that they are in chief value of papier mache; and that they -are, therefore, properly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Barum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  2. Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Wregg Imports v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API