State ex rel. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHolmes, J.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion which, in my view, completely misconstrues the plain language of R.C. 4123.57(B), as amended effective October 1, 1963. The statute is not expressly made retrospective. Even if this threshold were met, R.C. 4123.57(B) does not contravene the ban upon retrospective legislation set forth in Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, as it does not take away or impair any vested substantive rights acquired prior to October 1, 1963.
The issue presented in this case is of a species with which the majority of this court, as well as this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lakengren, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Latino v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.