Legal Opinion
Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 25, 2001No. 2000PublishedCited by 473 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Carlos PelaezAEdison Carmona (petitioner or appellant), a federal inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, moves for appointment of counsel to assist him in his appeal from a May 2, 2000 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Amon, J.), dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Relief was denied because of petitioner’s failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. After determining that the existing administrative scheme no longer provided Carmona an opportunity to exhaust his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Edwards v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by473 opinions
- Alonzo Cook v. New York State Division of Parole, and New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Elliott Levine v. Craig ApkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Thompson v. ChoinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Palacio v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Queen v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
468 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.