Legal Opinion
Montez v. McKinna
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 3, 2000No. 99-1347PublishedCited by 666 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After examining petitioner Lorenzo Montez’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Proceeding pro se, Montez seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. Incarcerated in a private correctional facility in Colorado, Montez filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In the petition, Montez claimed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by666 opinions
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Shelby Moffat v. Edward BroylesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Joel White v. John Lambert, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Hayward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
661 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.