State v. Seay
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error in the denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss for denial of his right to a speedy trial embodied in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment and the Eighteenth Section of the First Article of the North Carolina Constitution. Almost five years had passed from the alleged embezzlements in April, 1973 until the 27 February 1978 indictments.
Such a long period of time, nothing else appearing, constitutes unusual and undue delay.
“[W]hen there has been an atypical delay in issuing a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. Storms (In Re Storms)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Andrews v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
- State v. RupeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. PollockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SeufertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.