Legal Opinion

State v. Seufert

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1980No. 809SC490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

We first consider defendant’s assignment of error that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the evidence. G.S. 15A-1227.

Seven of the indictments (including the one relating to “employees of the Steinthal Corporation”) charge that the embezzlement occurred on 15 October 1978 and 31 January 1979, and six indictments charge that the embezzlement occurred on 18 October 1978 and 31 January 1979. All indictments charge in substance that the defendant was President of Stein-thal Corporation, was the agent of the corporation, as such agent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. LouchheimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. Salisbury Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. State v. . AgeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ChildersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  4. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Delano Compton, etc. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API