Legal Opinion
Niehaus v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 2002No. 01 CIV. 3030(JSR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
This putative class action alleges that defendant AT & T Corp. (“AT & T”) falsely billed customers for Internet-generated international calls to the Pacific island nations of Vanuatu and Niue, when in fact the calls had been re-routed to less exotic, and less expensive, destinations. By Order dated September 28, 2001, the Court (a) granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims brought under 47 U.S.C. § 401 and 47 U.S.C.' § 228; (b) denied defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims brought under 47 U.S.C. § 201, 47 U.S.C. § 203, and state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Communications Association, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Long Distance Telecommunications Litigation. Charles Kaplan v. itt-u.s. Transmission Systems, Inc., Roger Lee v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Collins v. Olin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Ellis v. Tribune TV Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Telstar Resource Group, Inc. v. MCI, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007