Legal Opinion

Seorum v. Marudas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1944No. 33,665PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff brought action against defendants for damages sustained by virtue of a fall into an elevator shaft on premises in control of defendants. At the close of the trial on March 26, 1943, the case was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for defendants.

Subsequently on May 15, 1943, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The order granting such motion did not state the grounds therefor. A memorandum attached to the order indicated the court determined that its failure to instruct the jury relative to certain statutes applicable to elevators…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Doerner v. EnglishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API