Seorum v. Marudas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiff brought action against defendants for damages sustained by virtue of a fall into an elevator shaft on premises in control of defendants. At the close of the trial on March 26, 1943, the case was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for defendants.
Subsequently on May 15, 1943, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The order granting such motion did not state the grounds therefor. A memorandum attached to the order indicated the court determined that its failure to instruct the jury relative to certain statutes applicable to elevators…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Doerner v. EnglishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946