Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1962No. 38,407PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court setting aside a jury verdict in its favor and granting a new trial. The only direct reference in the order to the basis for the trial court’s decision is contained in the following language:

“* * * and the court being of the view that an error of law was committed by the court in failing to instruct the jury with respect to the applicability of Section 616.01, M. S. A., as requested by plaintiff’s counsel.

“It Is Therefor Hereby Ordered, that the verdict of the jury in the above-entitled action, returned herein on the 3rd day of November, 1960,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Satter v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Weatherhead v. BurauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Miller v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Mjos Ex Rel. Mjos v. Village of Howard LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Anderson v. GabrielsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Speyer v. Savogran Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API