Legal Opinion
Harewood v. Carter
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 1, 2001No. AC 20202PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The first issue to be decided in this case, which arises out of a motor vehicle accident, is whether the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict on count two of the plaintiffs complaint, which alleged a violation of General Statutes §§ 14-227a1 and 14-218a2 and made a concomi*201tant claim for double or treble damages pursuant to General Statutes § 14-295.3 Because we conclude that the court should not have granted the motion and that a new trial is necessary, we reach the second issue, that is, whether the parties must relitigate issues…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bishop v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Abramczyk v. AbbeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.