Legal Opinion

State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1987No. S-2122, 2141PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the superior court, attached as appendix, except as noted hereafter. The traditional rule that judicial decisions should apply retroactively governs this case as the resolution of the issue presented was foreshadowed by prior opinions of the state attorney general, there has been no irremediable reliance on the statute in question, and inequity would result if only the appellees were to receive the benefit of this ruling. See Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Byayuk, 684 P.2d 114, 117 (Alaska 1984).

Accordingly, we remand this case to…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Synar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  4. DeArmond v. Alaska State Development CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ellis v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sonneman v. HickelAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gilmore v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kenai Peninsula Borough v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API