Sonneman v. Hickel
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
This case challenges the act which created the Alaska Marine Highway System Fund, ch. 193, § 1, SLA 1990, AS 19.65.-050-100, on the grounds that the fund is dedicated to a special purpose in violation of article IX, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution. The trial court ruled that the act was constitutional because it merely “ ‘allows’ the legislature to appropriate funds from the fund to the Alaska Marine Highways but does not require it.” We conclude that most of the act is constitutional, that the limitation on departmental power to request that the fund be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Jefferson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Alaska Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Gilmore v. Alaska Workers' Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.