Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Midland Steel Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1899No. 2,762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, 0. J.-

The appellant brought his action against the appellee to recover damages for a personal injury. The complaint showed that the appellant was engaged as an employe of the appellee in its manufacturing establishment, at work in a pit wherein was a certain hydraulic crane, connected with which was a hydraulic feed pump, by the use of which the water to operate the crane was pumped from a cistern into an accumulator, whence the water flowed into the crane and operated it. Erom the jib of the crane were hung certain heavy iron chains, and the crane was used in appellee’s business for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Peerless Stone Co. v. WrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wortman v. MinichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. WalshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Standard Cement Co. v. MinorIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Palmer v. Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Midland Steel Co. v. DaughertyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API