Midland Steel Co. v. Daugherty

Upon the first appeal in this case the judgment of the trial court was reversed because of error in sustaining a motion in arrest of judgment. Daugherty v. Midland Steel Co., 23 Ind. App. 78. The motion in arrest was then overruled, and judgment rendered on the general verdict in appellee’s favor. Erom that judg*273meat this appeal is prosecuted, and the only question discussed is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment on the jury’s answers to interrogatories.

The jury answered that appellee is thirty-one years old; on October 10, 1895, he had been working for about…