Legal Opinion

Welles v. Town of East Windsor

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This appeal concerns the adequacy of the notice given by a town, concerning the site of a proposed town facility. The plaintiffs, Martin N. Welles and Nancy F. Welles, appeal from the refusal of the trial court to grant them injunctive relief against the town of East Windsor and various of its officials who were named as defendants.

There is no disagreement about the underlying facts. In 1977, the East Windsor board of selectmen began to plan for the construction of a town health and safety complex. To facilitate this planning, a special town meeting was called for July 12, 1978. A…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Grudnosky v. BislowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Bedard v. CunneenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Bull v. Town of WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cocivi v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. R. B. Kent & Son, Inc. v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Planning & Zoning Commission v. GaalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Nazarko v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Mohican Valley Concrete Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API