Legal Opinion
Mohican Valley Concrete Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 2003No. AC 21794PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
General Statutes § 14-541 requires a person who contemplates establishing a new automobile dealership in this state to obtain a state license. A state license, in turn, is conditioned upon approval of the proposed location by a local zoning board. This case concerns the validity of a zoning board’s decision to grant such an approval.
The trial court held that the board had given sufficient notice of its proceedings and had properly applied the relevant provisions of the town’s zoning regulations. The court, however, declined to rule on the sufficiency of the evidence to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rudy's Limousine Service, Inc. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- One Elmcroft Stamford, LLC v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022