Legal Opinion
El Dorado at Santa Fe, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1976No. 10658PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPHENSON, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant (El Dorado) appeals from an order quashing an alternative writ of mandamus. El Dorado is the owner, developer and subdivider of a tract of land in Santa Fe County situated more than five miles from the boundary of any municipality. The alternative writ states in pertinent part:
4. Commencing in 1970, Plaintiff caused a portion of the Lands, consisting of approximately 6,000 acres, to be surveyed, planned, platted and subdivided by a duly licensed New Mexico surveyor as a residential subdivision known as “El Dorado at Santa Fe” (the Subdivision).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Fancher v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Castillo Corp. v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Hyde Park Co. v. Santa Fe City CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Perea v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Albuquerque v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.