Legal Opinion
Kwr Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 25, 2015No. 15-156CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the second set of motions for judgment on the administrative record filed by plaintiff, KWR Construction, Inc. (“KWR”), and defendant the United States (“the government”), in connection with the United States Air Force’s (“the agency”) award of four firm-fixed-price indefinite-delivery-indefinite-quantity (“IDIQ”) multiple award construction contracts (“MACCs”) for Luke Air Force Base, Gila Bend Air Force Auxiliary Field, and Ft. Tut-hill Recreational Area near Phoenix, Arizona (together, “Luke AFB”). 1 At issue in these motions is the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- UnitedHealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- MacAulay-brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Remington Arms Company, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Acetris Health, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.