Legal Opinion
Whr Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2015No. 13-515CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bid Protest; Claim for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses Under the Equal Access to Justice Act; Injunctive Relief Granted; Irrational Corrective Action; Whether Defendant’s Position was Substantially Justified.
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff, WHR Group, Inc. (“WHR”), prevailed in a bid protest, WHR Group, Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed.Cl. 386 (2014) (Block, J.), and now seeks attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C.. § 2412. Chief Judge Patricia Campbell-Smith transferred this case to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Baker v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- James Doty and Susan Doty v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- BASR Partnership Ex Rel. Pettinati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Dellew Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- 2m Research Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.