Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 2014No. B246782, B246786PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
At issue in this consolidated original proceeding is whether the Public Utilities Commission (the PUC) has the authority to implement the electric program investment charge (EPIC). EPIC requires electric utility corporations serving California to collect a surcharge on their ratepayers’ electricity bills to fund renewable energy research, development, and demonstration projects with the aim of making electricity service cheaper, safer, and more reliable for the corporations’ own ratepayers. Southern California Edison Company (SCE), one of the three large…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sagonowsky v. KekoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Pablo Bay Pipeline Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Templo v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.