Gaffney v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Dewayne Gaffney challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for perjury before the grand jury. We agree that, under the special “two-witness” rule applicable to perjury prosecutions, the evidence was insufficient. On that ground, we reverse appellant’s conviction. 1
Appellant was indicted on two counts of perjury for statements he made under oath before a Superior Court grand jury investigating the murder of Michael Taylor. The target of the investigation, Harry Wheeler, was suspected of having ordered Taylor’s murder in retaliation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Robert ChestmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tawanda Sheffield, Steven D. Lewis, and Allen Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Darius Brown and Jamal Shepherd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dreck Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.